The sealed, brushed aluminium housing of
Apple’s 20in Cinema
Display exudes the expensive quality of designer goods.
It has an elegant minimalism, which is evident from the box to the
near-invisible touch-sensitive control buttons, of which there are just two,
plus the power switch.
In operation you can’t fault the on-screen menu – because there isn’t one.
You have control over brightness, and that’s it. As a digital-only (DVI) panel,
it has no need for fiddly adjustments and won’t trouble you with choices over
colour temperature, image sharpness or menu language.
The image you’re presented with is a fait accompli: you can’t try to match
another monitor or choose a specific mode. It sets itself as the standard and
this, if you can let yourself relinquish control, is actually quite cathartic.
This monitor is being used by imaging professionals the world over, albeit on
Macs, which know exactly how to drive the monitor to its best advantage. The
more exacting PC user could still use third-party calibration tools to adjust
the image from the computer end of the connection.
By using an S-IPS panel ( see
box ), the Apple Cinema Display ensures the best colour
reproduction and is suited to colour-critical applications such as photo and
video editing.
Our tests showed good results all round, especially in the smoothness of
gentle gradations. Viewing angles are wide and, although S-IPS colour shift is
present in the darkest greys, it’s far from pronounced.
Overall, it’s joint first for image quality with HP’s very different
f2105.
The external power supply connects DVI, USB and Firewire ports to the monitor
by a single cable, keeping your desk as tidy as the monitor itself.
It’s a little pricey, but if you value design and image quality more than
features it’s the ideal choice.
This is part of a group test looking at widescreen TFTs. For other
products in the test, see:
Apple 20in Cinema Display
Belinea 10 20 35W
Dell Ultrasharp 2005FPW
HP f2105
LG M203WX
Philips Brilliance 200W6
TFT Technology
Should you go widescreen?
Reader comments