Wikipedia has become one of the most
consulted works of reference available in the English language. Compiled not by
academics, but by the average Joe and Joanne on the street, Wikipedia is the
world’s first collaborative encyclopaedia, where amateur, expert and enthusiast
alike are free to create or contribute to entries on topics and people that
interest them.
Critics say the information on the site is rarely verified, while fans say
the critics are simply missing the point of this online research tool. Join us
for a walk on the Wiki side.
‘Wiki’ comes from the Hawaiian phrase wiki wiki, meaning quick, and is also
an acronym of ‘what I know is’. The word is synonymous with websites based on
open-source software that can be edited quickly and easily by anyone with an
interest in a topic. It’s this ability to change articles, in particular, that
has attracted the ire of academics.
Certain entries give those with strong opinions the opportunity to score a
cheap point. For example, the entry on US President George Bush has been amended
with negative, satirical, offensive or plain inaccurate material so many times
that new and recently registered users are barred from editing it without
permission.
Creating false entries or adding inaccurate information to an existing one is
called vandalism in the wiki community, and the site’s founders (the
not-for-profit
Wikimedia
Foundation) encourages all users to report those who vandalise, and to
correct entries if they feel qualified to do so.
One of the most notorious examples of this involved a man called Brian Chase,
who thought it would be funny to post a hoax biographical entry on John
Seigenthaler, a respected journalist and former editor of The Tennessean in the
US.
Among other untruths, Mr Chase claimed Mr Seigenthaler was linked to the
assassinations of both John and Robert Kennedy. The libellous content went
unnoticed for 132 days before it was removed. Mr Chase was tracked down using
his IP address, and was forced to resign from his job and make a personal
apology.
Reader comments