Yahoo's board has hit back at attempts by investment mogul Carl Icahn to
force
a takeover of the firm by Microsoft.
Icahn sent an
open
letter on 15 May to Yahoo chairman Roy Bostock threatening to oust the board
and replace it with a group prepared to negotiate a deal with Microsoft.
"It is clear to me that the board of directors of Yahoo has acted
irrationally and lost the faith of shareholders and Microsoft," Icahn wrote.
"It is quite obvious that Microsoft's bid of $33 per share is a superior
alternative to Yahoo's prospects on a standalone basis.
"During the past week, a number of shareholders have asked me to lead a proxy
fight to attempt to remove the current board and establish a new board which
would attempt to negotiate a successful merger with Microsoft, something that in
my opinion the current board has completely botched."
Bostock issued a response to Icahn in an
open
letter of his own, explaining Yahoo's side in the Microsoft acquisition saga
and chastising Icahn over his threat.
"Unfortunately your letter reflects a significant misunderstanding of the
facts about the Microsoft proposal and the diligence with which our board
evaluated and responded to that proposal," Bostock wrote.
"Conversely, we do not believe it is in the best interests of Yahoo
stockholders to allow you and your hand-picked nominees to take control of Yahoo
for the express purpose of trying to force a sale of Yahoo to a formerly
interested buyer who has publicly stated that they have moved on."
The Yahoo board also attempted to dismiss any claims that it was not acting
entirely in the interests of the shareholders.
Since the beginning of the saga in April, analysts have speculated that Yahoo
veterans such as chief executive Jerry Yang would fight the deal out of disdain
for the corporate culture at Microsoft.
"In short, Yahoo's board was at every point in this process prepared to enter
into a transaction with Microsoft that would maximise stockholder value, and
included certainty of value and closing," wrote Bostock.
"What Yahoo's independent board refused to do was to allow control of this
company to be acquired for less than its full value."
Reader comments