Consumer protection to cover software and digital media
Consumers could get the same legal protection for software that they get for other goods under new proposals from the EU.
Commissioners Meglena Kuneva and Viviane Reding have called for software makers and companies to be made to take on more accountability for the products they offer to consumers.
They hope to extend the EU Sales and Guarantees directive that is incorporated into UK law as the Sale and Supply of Goods to Consumers Regulations 2002.
Currently UK consumers are not protected by either the Sale and Supply of Goods Act or the Distance Selling Regulations when they buy software.
This is because software is not considered a ‘tangible moveable item’. Once the seal has been broken or a program downloaded, consumers can’t return software.
The buyer only has a case against a retailer if they have bought the software on a DVD or CD and the physical medium is damaged.
The commissioners have proposed that because of this lack of protection, software is a priority area for possible EU action.
Ms Kuneva, the EU consumer affairs commissioner, said consumer protection must be extended to cover “licensing agreements of products like software downloaded for virus protection, games or other licensed content.
"Licensing should guarantee consumers the same basic rights as when they purchase a good: the right to get a product that works with fair commercial conditions."
She argued that this would also give consumers more confidence when buying online.
"If we want consumers to shop around and exploit the potential of digital communications, then we need to give them confidence that their rights are guaranteed.
“That means putting in place and enforcing clear consumer rights that meet the high standards already existing in the main street,” she said.
But the plans, which form part of an ongoing EU review into consumer law, to harmonise laws between member states have not been welcomed by software developers.
Francisco Mingorance, senior director for public policy of the Business Software Alliance said extending the rules to cover digital content is unworkable.
“Digital content is not a tangible good and should not be subject to the same liability rules as toasters. Unlike tangible goods, creators of ‘digital content’ cannot predict with a high degree of certainty both the product’s anticipated uses and its potential performance.
He also warned the proposed extension could capture a virtually unlimited range of content including patches, updates and trial software.
Article tags
Related articles
Q.How do I stop Windows 7 search?
Q.Is it a genuine call from Microsoft?
Q.How can I turn Autoplay back on?
Need more power than from a tablet computer?
Basic Input Output System. Essential software built into every PC that connects the vital components....
|
|
|
|
|
Nikon Coolpix S570 BlackPrice: £66.99 |
Back Issue CD-Rom 13 (2010)Price: £9.99 |
Marine AquariumPrice: £15.41 |
Print Saver EcoPrice: £19.99 |
Norton Internet Security 2012 - 3 PCs, 1 year protectionPrice: £24.99 |
Software consumer protection
At last. Software developers have got away with this for too long. he "try before you buy" developers have ALWAYS had my full support and I do pay for software when it is either excellent at what it does, great value for money or preferably both. This should be the model to base ALL software sales on. Commercial software developers who hide their shoddy products behind the current lack of consumer protection will be the ones who will complain the loudest. Avoid them wih immediate effect! Don't wait for the law to change!
Posted by Benson, 25 May 2009
Are software developers responsible for your changing the PC
It would be hard on software developer if you install the software and then do something to the PC (change hardware, upgrade drivers, uninstall software, edit registry) and then claim that the software developers are now responsible for the software not working. You can imaging millions of people "disrupting" the operation of the software after nearly 2 years, and then expecting the developers to refund them the original purchase price.
Posted by Guy Simpson, 27 May 2009