Survey of six UK cities finds 24% of wireless networks use no encryption
A survey of six UK cities has found that just under a quarter of wireless networks are running without any security whatsoever.
Around half of nearly 40,000 networks scanned were protected by modern WPA or WPA2 encryption, just under 10,000 were not secured and the remainder were protected only by the relatively insecure WEP system.
The survey was conducted by driving around London, Birmingham, Manchester, Bristol, Edinburgh and Cardiff scanning for wireless networks using freely available software and recording how many were protected by encryption.
In a separate experiment a fake public wireless hotspot was set up in each city in order to see how many users would open an insecure wireless connection to it. Almost 400 people across the six cities surveyed did so.
"When people think of hackers they tend to think of highly organised criminal gangs using sophisticated techniques to crack networks", said Jason Hart, who carried out the experiments on behalf of the insurance company CPP.
"However, as this experiment demonstrates, all a hacker requires is a laptop computer and widely available software to target their victims."
For a step-by-step guide to securing a home network, click here.
Article tags
Related articles
Q.Can I switch boot drives so that I can work on older...
Q.Can I open my old genealogy files or have they gone...
Q.Why are odd patterns appearing on my monitors shortly...
The simplest way to run two hard disks in the same PC is to have a dual-boot start-up menu. Using a switch to flick between the two can lead to loss of data
A technology for downloading files. Allows even very large files to be downloaded quickly.
|
|
|
|
|
Computeractive Excel (2010) Online tutorialPrice: £19.99 |
Computeractive Word (2010) Online TutorialPrice: £19.99 |
Computeractive Powerpoint (2010) Online TutorialPrice: £19.99 |
Angry BirdsPrice: £9.99 |
Back Issue CD-Rom 14 (2011)Price: £15.99 |
wireless
Hello round here where I live hardly anyone who has a laptop is secured,as if I wanted to could log into anyones,ive told them about it but they dont seem to care
Posted by Edgar Mills, 14 Oct 2010
who is at fault
acording to form and the law it is the person doing the hacking in to wifi network not the person that fails to secure their wireless router you would think there was some onus on who the router belongs to I myself have got insider which is software that anables you to see other peoples wi-fi connections
Posted by c.thorpe, 15 Oct 2010