Watchdog tightens orders directory service operators to tighen procedures
Icstis is moving swiftly to end an abuse of 118 118 and similar directory-enquiry services uncovered by Computeractive.
The premium rate watchdog said it now expects directory service companies to put safeguards in place to close a loophole that allows people to bypass some call-barring facilities.
Its concerns centre around what is called 'call completion'. This is an ancillary service telephone directory companies can offer customers. It allows the companies to connect a caller directly to a number, normally after a query from the caller.
However, Computeractive has learned that teenagers are making use of call completion to bypass parental controls on landline phones.
Instead of using directory enquiries as a number-finding service, they simply give an operator the mobile phone number and ask to be connected directly.
When we contacted Icstis about this issue it liaised with regulator Ofcom to make sure the loophole was not a breach of the code of practice that directory enquiry companies have to abide by.
Although it concluded that there was no breach, it agreed the problem showed the system was open to abuse.
It was also concerned about child protection as this loophole could be used by paedophiles to get children to contact them. Because no phone number bar the 118 service would appear on the bill, parents would not be aware of whom their child was calling.
"This shouldn't happen and we expect the operators to ascertain why someone who already has a number wants to be connected through directory enquiries rather than calling direct," said an Icstis representative.
"We have been told some adults are using this as a means of hiding an affair. However, what is alright between consenting adults and the bill payers does not apply to children."
Computeractive reader Paul Gallaher of Batley, West Yorkshire, who first alerted us to this problem, was saddled with a bill of nearly £680 that had been run up by his teenage daughter using the 118 118 directory enquiry service. He said he believed it was a ploy well known by local teenagers.
Both Icstis and Computeractive independently verified that 118 118 operators were doing this. Twelve other directory enquiry services, when blind tested, refused to connect us, saying we should contact the operator.
Although we found that only 118 118 operators was connecting people this way, Icstis is writing to all directory enquiry companies about the matter.
118 118 told Computeractive it was deeply concerned by our findings. It said it was already looking at measures that could be put in place to prevent a repeat of this problem.
As a goodwill gesture it is prepared to pay a significant proportion of Mr Gallaher's bill.
Related article:
Loophole
exposed to get around call barring to mobile phones
Related articles
Irfanview uses an automation feature called batch processing to change multiple images to a different size, format and name far faster than it would take manually
|
|
|
|
|
Computeractive Excel (2010) Online tutorialPrice: £19.99 |
Computeractive Word (2010) Online TutorialPrice: £19.99 |
Computeractive Powerpoint (2010) Online TutorialPrice: £19.99 |
Angry BirdsPrice: £9.99 |
Back Issue CD-Rom 14 (2011)Price: £15.99 |
Abuse of 118 numbers
We too have been 'victims' of this 'scam' by our teenage son who has used the 118 service 168 times in a 3 week period running up a bill of £122.00. Our usual monthly bill would be £25.00. Having made enquiries with our phone company to request a barr on these types of numbers we were advised it could not be done. So, like countless other consumers who think they have secured their line from making mobile and premium rate numbers, the kids find a way around it. As your article mentions, the phone companies should be made aware of the line having a barr in place. However, this is unlikely to happen as it all comes down to money in the end and no profit is no gain. We have, therefore, resigned ourselves to removing the phone from the house each day as we leave for work. Rather sad but necessary don't you think?!
Posted by Julie Grady, 17 May 2007
Another rip off that i'm not standing for!
Hi. I've just been reading about the call completion scam on 118118. I too have a large telephone bill as a result of this, which i am absolutely refusing to pay. My provider is Virgin who refuse to budge on the matter. In my view Virgin offered a service which they charged me for and then failed to provide. I will see them in court if necessary. Anyone got any advice??
Posted by Craig Lee, 24 Sep 2007
Blocking calls to 118 numbers
After much research, yes it is possible to block all calls to all 118 numbers in the UK.You need to know that these calls are not clasified as "premium rate numbers" but "operator assisted calls". You can block these with BT for £2.50 per month.Yes, it's a rip off, but worth it if your son or daughter is getting connected to mobiles in this way.It is part of BT's call barring service.
Posted by John Brady, 14 Aug 2009