Local authorities caught between “rock and a hard place" over surveillance laws
Local councils have been urged to make more use of their powers under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (Ripa) to snoop on people they suspect of committing offences.
In his 2007 report published last month, Sir Paul Kennedy, the Interception of Communications Commissioner, said not enough councils were making use of their powers under Ripa to obtain people’s communications data.
Ripa is the law that regulates the powers of public bodies to carry out surveillance, investigation and the interception of communications.
The report showed that more than 500,000 official requests for private communications data such as telephone records were made last year by official bodies. However, the report said only 1,707 requests had come from councils, which were seeking data such as phone and email records.
Out of the approximately 474 local authorities in England and Wales only 154 used the powers last year.
Sir Paul said: "Our inspections have shown that generally the local authorities could make much more use of communications data as a powerful tool to investigate crime.”
He said the councils that requested communications data could use this information to identify criminals who “persistently rip off consumers, cheat the taxpayer, deal in counterfeit goods, and prey on the elderly and vulnerable. [and] to identify fly-tippers.”
However, in a separate report published at the same time, Sir Christopher Rose, Chief Surveillance Commissioner, criticised local authorities for doing just that.
He said in his annual report that local authorities had a "tendency to expose a lack of understanding of the legislation" and demonstrated a "serious misunderstanding of the concept of proportionality"; for example using these powers to deal with minor offences such as fly-tipping or avoiding council tax.
Sir Christopher was particularly concerned that there was a risk of councils crossing the legal line into "intrusive surveillance", such as placing a surveillance device inside a private vehicle, which they are prohibited from doing.
Councils also cannot bug telephone conversations. This is a power reserved for the police and security services and which must be authorised by the Home Office.
Simon Milton, chairman of the Local Government Association (LGA), defended local authorities and said councils were often caught between a “rock and a hard place”; portrayed as using the powers for trivial offences yet told to use them more.
Article tags
Related articles
Q.How do I stop Windows 7 search?
Q.Is it a genuine call from Microsoft?
Q.How can I turn Autoplay back on?
We ask why ebooks readers have no embedded fonts or easily accessible footnotes and how typographical errors not in the original book appear
|
|
|
|
|
Nikon Coolpix S570 BlackPrice: £66.99 |
Computeractive Ultimate Guide - Storage, Sharing & BackupPrice: £5.99 |
Back Issue CD-Rom 13 (2010)Price: £9.99 |
Hallmark Card Studio DeluxePrice: £15.31 |
Marine AquariumPrice: £15.41 |
Ridiculous Idea
This is the reason why groups that scream about "abuses of power" are gaining in popularity. This is not what these powers were established for - I can only hope that the new Government (the one that will replace Labour at the next election) will repeal this. Before the "What do you have to hide" brigade start, answer me this...ordinary people like myself send letters and not postcards, is there now a presumption that we have something to hide?
Posted by Colin, 18 Aug 2008
councils
yet another example of the police state we now live in. what happened to democracy a dirty word in this country now a legacy of "new labour"
Posted by ian duff, 15 Aug 2008
Civil liberties say goodbye!
Once again our civil liberties are been rapidilly eroded!Are we not already bombarded with ever greater use of survailance cameras?So" Local authorities"have been urged to "spy" on its own public citizens this surmounts to an ever increase of the big brother state,i often wonder are we living in the uk or "Russia" thanks for the article,but be carefull you may be the next to be under scruitiny!
Posted by jeffrey gilbert, 15 Aug 2008
Snooping
When will these people remember who pays them and get on and carry out the tasks we have paid them to do, rather than finding any excuse to opt out
Posted by Syd, 15 Aug 2008
Akin to the Stazi
What right has the local council got to snoop on anyone, they may be a locally elected body but they are made up of Mr & Mrs Joe Average. If I ever feel an overwhelming need to dodge my taxes or fly tip I am certainly going to email my mates and put it in a blog. The Stazi in East Germany operated with a similar mandate to this proposal. It's a terrible situation where these people are given the right to make and enforce local laws and the mandarins in parliament are giving them more powers.
Posted by Terry Pike, 15 Aug 2008