Telecoms regulator will have central role to play in punishing persistent piracy
It appears that Ofcom will have a central role to play in the fight against people illegally downloading copyrighted material from the internet.
Yesterday, culture secretary Andy Burnham (now health secretary) told delegates at Music Week’s Making Online Music Pay conference that the Government intends "to give Ofcom powers to apply technical measures" to combat the problem.
Although some major internet service providers (ISPs) are sending out cease-and-desist letters to people identified as persistent offenders, Mr Burnham did not rule out legal intervention entirely, saying notification may not be enough.
"Both sides [ISPs and the entertainment industry] must find a point of balance. Don't wait for the heavy hand of Government, do it now. If you wait for Government, then that might be worse," he is reported as saying.
A representative for the Music Publishers' Association told Computeractive that ISPs were represented at the conference by trade body ISPA and that the mood was amicable.
"In the past we may have seemed poles apart but the gap is rapidly decreasing. ISPs have an interest in stopping illegal file-sharing because it eats up their bandwidth and the entertainment industry is also looking at what we can do to help ISPs," he said.
But quite what these technical measures would be was not made clear. A three-strikes rule against persistent offenders appears, at the moment, to be unlikely. The Government has repeatedly shied away from the idea when questioned about it.
Also amendment 138/46 of the Telecoms package currently being debated in the EU would outlaw this as a measure. Neither are ISPs nor the entertainment industry keen on the idea of a digital rights agency.
The Digital Britain report, which is expected to be published on 16 June, should however outline future Government proposals.
Article tags
Related articles
Q.Why can't my browser find the website address I typed...
Q.All updates have been downloaded, so why won't Windows...
Q.How do I stop Windows 7 search?
We ask why ebooks readers have no embedded fonts or easily accessible footnotes and how typographical errors not in the original book appear
|
|
|
|
|
Nikon Coolpix S570 BlackPrice: £66.99 |
Computeractive Ultimate Guide - Storage, Sharing & BackupPrice: £5.99 |
Back Issue CD-Rom 13 (2010)Price: £9.99 |
Hallmark Card Studio DeluxePrice: £15.31 |
Marine AquariumPrice: £15.41 |
Too late to go back now
It?s about time people realised that the whole business of copyright has changed, and any amount of intervention by the authorities can easily be circumvented now, let alone in the future. At present there are services that will download a torrent file for you, and transfer it on as a normal file download, making it appear to an ISP as just a normal program file of software update. A new way of reimbursing artists and copyright holders needs to be found, possibly a great increase in fees charged to radio and TV stations etc. as well as PRS payments. The VAST majority of file sharers are NOT defrauding anyone, as if the files were not available freely, they certainly wouldn?t be spending their hard cash on CDs and DVDs. Whoever first put a CD/DVD drive in a computer is to blame really????????
Posted by Robert Hitchcock, 06 Jun 2009
Great News
If OFCOM is as usless at enforcing rules as it is with BT and other telecom providers I don't think anyone will ever be disconnected. I suspect however when it comes to dealing with the 'Little People' they will be alot tougher and less forgiving.
Posted by David Compton, 06 Jun 2009
and how will they differentiate between legal and illegal downloads?
Just wondering how this "technology" will differentiate between people using file sharing to download copies of Linux or OpenOffice, and things released under GPL or PD, vs. people downloading illegal copies of things like Windows, or the latest Pop Idol rubbish single. Hopefully it wont just block everything regardless (which is most probably the plan) as that could destroy Open Source. .
Posted by Darren, 06 Jun 2009