Just where does the buck stop?
Internet fraud is increasing so quickly that some overwhelmed police forces are refusing to investigate incidents where less than £1,000 has been lost.
The existence of a threshold for such crimes has been exposed by online auction house Ebay, after reports from victims who complained that police failed to act.
The failure to investigate and prosecute offenders was causing the public real harm, Ebay said.
Speaking to the House of Lords Science and Technology Committee on Personal Internet Security , Gareth Griffith, Ebay's head of trust and safety in the UK, said: "When we try to get police involved, sometimes they will say 'We'd love to help you but if it is not over X threshold of thousands of pounds, we cannot'.
"Users come back to us saying the police are not interested because it's only a £500 laptop."
The threshold seems to vary between individual forces, according to Andrew Goodwill, managing director of card fraud prevention company Early Warning.
But with detectives busy investigating other cases of online crime, such as child abuse, hacking and major virus attacks, fraud cases where an individual has only lost a few hundred pounds are pushed to the back of the queue.
A Scotland Yard report released in January backs up these findings. This report said that the scale and the international nature of these crimes meant police could not investigate all alleged offences as a matter of course.
Michael Barrett, chief information security officer at electronic payments firm Paypal, said this practice is resulting in unnecessary crimes being committed.
He said: "You could argue that this is causing the public real harm. You will often find there is a threshold before you can get a prosecutor interested in a case.
"What we do is slowly build a dossier on an individual [perpetrator] until they reach the threshold."
Computeractive's sister publication, Computing, talked to Detective Sergeant Damian Morgan of West Midlands Police’s high-tech crime unit who said thresholds do not officially exist, but such decisions may take place.
"There are no threshold policies written down on paper. But there may be local decisions being made on these crimes and how far they get investigated, rather than a central policy being written. This may also be the case in other local forces," said Det Sgt Morgan.
Rick Naylor, vice-president of the Police Superintendents' Association, said he is unaware of such thresholds in normal policing.
However, Computeractive has received complaints from readers who tell us that when they have reported Ebay fraud to local police, the authorities have not been interested in investigating. Often this is because they have only lost - in police parlance - a relatively small sum of money.
These latest findings on the problems of reporting online fraud, combined with a change in reporting procedures for the public from 1 April 2007, will do nothing to help consumer confidence said Goodwill.
"This is the start of a slippery slope. Police forces are under-resourced and with the public only meant to report online fraud to their bank and not the police soon means things are getting really silly now. Where will it end?," he said.
"When we have been burgled, will we have to report the burglary to our insurance company to investigate? The fraudsters are getting away with it and people are going to be incensed that they are getting no help from the police."
Article tags
Related articles
Q.Can I switch boot drives so that I can work on older...
Q.Can I open my old genealogy files or have they gone...
Q.Why are odd patterns appearing on my monitors shortly...
Government agency raps short-term loan company for threatening letters
|
|
|
|
|
Computeractive Excel (2010) Online tutorialPrice: £19.99 |
Computeractive Word (2010) Online TutorialPrice: £19.99 |
Computeractive Powerpoint (2010) Online TutorialPrice: £19.99 |
Angry BirdsPrice: £9.99 |
Back Issue CD-Rom 14 (2011)Price: £15.99 |
crime..police..useless!!!
what is the point of having a police force,if someone commits a crime,no matter how small and they can not be bothered to investigate. my sons pocket money has been stolen via ebay and the thief must have a big smile on his face,as well as the money.In this case from 11 other ebay buyers who bought the same item. If I was mugged in the high street and I new who the thief was,the police would arrest the mugger,whether he stole a £1 or £1000. So for them to be to buisy on other things,in my opinoin is rubbish. Maybe it depends on who you are and what position you hold in england,whether the police help you or not..
Posted by bernard grice, 06 May 2007
Its not a priority crime.
The simple fact the police do not invesigate fraud as much as robbery, burglary, car crime, violent crime or drugs offences is becuase the home office do not consider it a priority offence! Fraud can be involving and time consuming and although the government fail to realise that the majority of victims of fraud, are law abiding / voting citizens. Eventually the offence will be a priority, but how bad the situation will have to get before that happens is anybodies guess!
Posted by Mr A, 20 May 2007
TOO MUCH WORK?!
Disappointment within the British police force is obvious, with tc documentaries proving that they only tackle crime where they will only get instant results, minimal forms to fill and more sitting on bum time! Lets nail a kid smoking a spliff or someone on the mobile whilst driving or with a light out on car etc rather than help people that have been affected by crime. Dispicable that we have to pay them through council tax then they wont help when needed! Lost money through a holiday purchased via ebay, the seller keeps cancelling cheques though we are entitled to deposit refund, after 45 days so ebay cannot help and they advise contacting the police! According to these online reports, is it worth it!! Vigilantes required!!
Posted by BST-COMMS, 28 Dec 2007
But what if the fraud victim was the government ?
So what happens when its the government that is defrauded ? Do the police turn around and not investigate that then ? Do people who claim benefits they're not entitled to, ever get caught ? Or is it a case of double standards. You can bet if you stole money from the government, even if a tiny amount, the police wouldn't leave any stone unturned in trying to catch you.
Posted by Hickster, 18 Apr 2008