Privacy campaigners and political parties call for Contactpoint database to be scrapped
A new Government database containing details of every child in England has been dealt another blow.
This week, ministers announced that the launch of the £224m Contactpoint database would be delayed from Autumn until January for technical reasons.
Privacy groups and political parties have said the database, carrying personal information about all under-18s, should be “buried” and “scrapped”.
In a letter to Barry Sheerman, chair of the Commons Children, Schools and Families Committee, Kevin Brennan, the Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Children, Young People and Families said the “deployment of Contactpoint will not begin in October 2008 as originally planned”.
He said this was because the Government had “identified some issues as a result of recent system tests which we are working urgently to address”.
The Department for Children, Schools and Families said that the delay was not due to security issues, but technical problems with aspects of the database such as dropdown menus.
The spokeswoman said: "We are working hard to iron out glitches before it goes out to users. This is not about security issues."
However, this has angered privacy group No2ID, which has said citing technical issues is “ridiculous”.
“Blaming dropdown menus is like considering whether a grenade is pink or green before handing it to a child.
“The Government is going to expose the details of children and their parents to the country and dropdown menus are all it is worried about.”
He pointed out that this was the second time the database had been put back following concerns over data security.
“This database shouldn’t just be delayed it should be buried,” he added.
The Liberal Democrats agreed. David Laws, children's spokesman for the party, said: "Instead of delaying the launch of the database, this intrusive project must be scrapped altogether.”
"A recent independent review has already undermined all of the Government's assurances that the database will be secure.
“The discovery of further technical issues does not bode well for the future. The Government has proven itself untrustworthy with large databases containing sensitive data," he added.
The news of the delay follows fresh privacy concerns after it was announced this week that the police would also be able to access children’s records.
Article tags
Related articles
Q.Why are some of the keys on my keyboard doing strange...
Q.Is my phone’s Bluetooth any use?
Q.Can I switch boot drives so that I can work on older...
Irfanview uses an automation feature called batch processing to change multiple images to a different size, format and name far faster than it would take manually
|
|
|
|
|
Computeractive Excel (2010) Online tutorialPrice: £19.99 |
Computeractive Word (2010) Online TutorialPrice: £19.99 |
Computeractive Powerpoint (2010) Online TutorialPrice: £19.99 |
Angry BirdsPrice: £9.99 |
Back Issue CD-Rom 14 (2011)Price: £15.99 |
child database
It should be scrapped, the information is not in safe hands with the current Government and Local Authorities. Instead of protection, the information would mostly be used for oppression. Local Authorities and Government routinely act in breach of peoples privacy. I myself am threatened by eviction because I refused to supply two months bank statements to the local Authority. Despite there being no law that permits them this information, they canceled my Housing Benefit and Council Tax claim in order to force me to provide this information. To allow them access to any information just allows them to abuse their power more easily to oppress the average citizen, mostly in the name of anti terrorism. The real threat of terrorism comes from the Government and Local Authorities who more and more take away the freedoms of the individual.
Posted by Edward Devoy, 01 Sep 2008