Simple clear advice in plain English

ISPs not liable for hate material

Changes mean internet providers are exempt from illegal speech transmitted over their networks

images of scales of justice
computing/computing-15-11-07/scales-justice

An amendment to the e-commerce directive means that internet service providers (ISPs) will not be held liable for religion- or sexuality-related hate speech transmitted over their networks.

The e-commerce directive protects ISPs from liability for material that they neither create nor monitor but simply store or pass on to users of their service.

The way these regulations are implemented in the UK mean the exemptions for ISPs only cover legislation passed before the 30 July 2002.

However, in 2008 the Government extended the offence of stirring up hatred on the grounds of religion contained in the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act to include stirring up of hatred on the grounds of someone’s sexuality.

This potentially left ISPs vulnerable and the scope was there to hold them liable for this content if transmitted over their networks.

Although the Government said in practice it was “very unlikely” ISPs would be held liable for the offences because of the requirement for intent, to clarify the position it has amended the e-commerce regulations.

A representative for the Internet Services Providers' Association (ISPA) told Computeractive that: ”ISPA welcomes the legal clarity that this provided but the Government should ‘future proof’ the regulations.”

“ISPA has repeatedly requested that the UK Regulations be amended to have a 'prospective effect'. Without this the e-commerce regulations only apply to UK legislation passed before 30 July 2002 and do not automatically apply to new laws, presenting ISPs with real risk of liability for offences each time a new piece of legislation is passed.

"This is another such case of where an amendment to the regulations has been required following a period of uncertainty for ISPs."

Article tags

Reader Comments

Double Standards

Strange that the Government exempts ISPs from this type of traffic, but not file sharing. Surely they couldn't be adapting the law depending on who they get pressure from could they? (Or even perhaps whos yacht Peter M. visits?)

Posted by Robert Clark, 22 Jan 2010

   

Add your comment

All fields must be completed. Your email address will not be displayed or used to send marketing messages.

All messages will be checked by moderators before appearing on the site.

See our Privacy Policy for more information.

Related articles

filmstrip

Online movie services are poor, finds digital rights organisation

ISPA welcomes ORG research into legal online movie services

Taking Stock trophy

Andrew Crossley nominated for ISPA Internet Villain award

ACS Law solicitor who acted for Media Cat in the controversial file sharing lawsuit brought the legal profession "into disrepute", says ISPA

High Court London

Talktalk and BT take the Digital Economy Act to court for review

Internet Service Providers want clarity from the High Court over "flawed" and controversial copyright infringement clauses in the Digital Economy Act

Question & Answer

Q.How do I store musician and other information about...

> Read the answer

Q.Why can't my browser find the website address I typed...

> Read the answer

Q.All updates have been downloaded, so why won't Windows...

> Read the answer

Best deals on the web

img

Apple MacBook Pro (MC724LL/A)

£999.99- Buy it now

img

Sony Vaio VPCF23P1E/B

£679.98- Buy it now

img

Sony Vaio VPCEH1J1E/W

£349.99- Buy it now

Great benefits for subscribers!

Poll

Which is your preferred web browser

Jargon Buster

Computing terms explained in plain English

Bittorrent

A technology for downloading files. Allows even very large files to be downloaded quickly.

Great shopping deals from Computeractive