Snap a copper, come a cropper
Photographers, both professional and amateur, have denounced a new law that could see them arrested for taking pictures of police officers.
The Counter-Terrorism Act 2008, which amends the Terrorism Act 2000, became law last month. The new set of rules under Section 78 of the new Act and 58A of the 2000 Act targets anyone who ‘elicits or attempts to elicit information about (members of armed forces, constables and the Queen’s guards) which is of a kind likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism’.
A person found guilty of this offence could be liable to a fine and even imprisonment for up to 10 years.
Although there are no legal restrictions about taking photographs in public places Computeractive’s sister publication, the British Journal of Photography (BJP) said that this hasn’t stopped police officers in the past from being overzealous.
In December last year it said while covering the wedding of a couple, freelance press photographer Jess Hurd had been detained for more than 45 minutes under section 44 of the 2000 Act. The Metropolitan police force told BJP that “any officer that suspects an offence has been committed has the right to detain you”.
The BJP said this type of incident is not uncommon. We have also found many incidents of member of the public being stopped by the police for taking photographs in public areas.
The Home Office admitted in November last year that “police had sometimes acted inappropriately at times”. With the new law photographers said they now feared the worst.
Related articles
Q.How do I store musician and other information about...
Q.Why can't my browser find the website address I typed...
Q.All updates have been downloaded, so why won't Windows...
Cheshire Council employee sent email containing sensitive personal details about an individual from her personal email account
|
|
|
|
|
Nikon Coolpix S570 BlackPrice: £66.99 |
Computeractive Ultimate Guide - Storage, Sharing & BackupPrice: £5.99 |
Back Issue CD-Rom 13 (2010)Price: £9.99 |
Hallmark Card Studio DeluxePrice: £15.31 |
Marine AquariumPrice: £15.41 |
g20 death - did the video break the law ?
One very obvious problem with this law is highlighted by the video showing the police attack (from behind no less) the man at the G20 protest. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/7989027.stm The person who filmed that was theoritcally breaking the law. Without the video the truth may have never come to light.
Posted by morgan, 08 Apr 2009
Snap a copper
Only a cursory glance through the TV Freeview programme schedules will reveal never ending footage of 'fly on the wall' police in action. Police Camera Action, Road Rage, Total Emergency, Police Interceptors is to mention just a few of the many. Most of the progammes focus on the latest equipment the police employ, both on the ground and in the air. Any would-be terrorist would learn infinitely more by watching only a few minutes of any of these films than he (or she) could glean from a single photograph of PC Plod. Surely, it must be about time that the pseudo intellectuals who dream up new legislation tried to use a little joined-up thinking, or am I being as naive as the aforementioned clowns? Yes, I do know the answer to this question.
Posted by Tony, 06 Mar 2009
many shopping centre ban photographs
I notice there are quite a few shopping centres now that also have signs up on the information sign showing a camera crossed out. Birmingham Bull Ring is one of them, and I think The Trafford Centre is the same, although everyone ignores the signs and takes pictures anyway, you just need to look on YouTube for this. Also many people who go there want to take pictures anyway to remember the day not be dictated to by some over-zealous shopping centre owner
Posted by Darren, 09 Mar 2009