Care has to be taken to ensure the vulnerable and people on low income are not adversely affected says Ofcom
The Government must carefully assess the impact that the proposed broadband levy may have on people on low incomes, warned the head of Ofcom’s Communications Consumer Panel (CCP).
Anna Bradley said the Panel had already heard rumblings of discontent from consumers about the proposed charge and believed that, to avoid paying, some people may disconnect their landline phone.
Speaking at the Westminster Media Forum yesterday, Ms Bradley voiced her concerns about how well the levy had been thought out. She told Computeractive that: “We haven’t seen the Government’s assessment of this yet and want to examine it to understand how it reaches its figures.
"It may be the only way to raise the funds but there could be other means, so it has to be carefully investigated; especially with the current economic problems. Some people may be badly affected by such a charge; even though it is a small amount.”
The charge Ms Bradley was talking about was proposed in last month’s Digital Britain report headed by Stephen Carter. In the report Lord Carter suggested a £6 per year ‘tax’ on the phone lines to people’s homes.
The aim is to start a fund that would help pay for the infrastructure necessary to deliver next-generation broadband to areas of the country internet service providers (ISPs) feel are commercially unviable.
The report said it could raise about £150- £175m per year, for the Independent Next Generation Fund. This will be administered by Ofcom, the telecommunications regulator and operators could bid for to roll out super-fast broadband - with speeds of up to 100Mbits/sec.
Ms Bradley said that the CCP would be looking carefully at the proposal over the coming months.
Article tags
Related articles
St Helena, a 'small British village' in the mid-Atlantic, is seeking support and funding for a broadband connection
|
|
|
|
|
Computeractive Excel (2010) Online tutorialPrice: £19.99 |
Computeractive Word (2010) Online TutorialPrice: £19.99 |
Computeractive Powerpoint (2010) Online TutorialPrice: £19.99 |
Angry BirdsPrice: £9.99 |
Back Issue CD-Rom 14 (2011)Price: £15.99 |
I totally agree
In that such changes should be far better thought through, because so many do live in poverty and the Internet to some is the main source of communications. Such people shouldn't be expected to pay such taxes, having said that, such taxes should not be imposed upon anyone, because the likes of BT have made huge profits which they should have and should reinvest. By the way the likes of Virgin have faster connections and do not receive any form of subsidies. Surely this must be viewed as merely another form of exploitation.
Posted by Phil, 11 Jul 2009
Make the user pay.
A tax of ,say, 20p per GB downloaded would be fairer.The more you use,the more you pay.Those who boast of downloading 500 GB a month would make a real contribution and may even change their habits.
Posted by Mike Bear, 12 Jul 2009
Oh dear...
Absolutely ridiculous comment by Mike Bear; to make a service such as unlimited internet access available to people, then penalise them for using it? Nonsense, even to me as a moderate internet user. As mentioned, BT make an enormous profit and should be reinvesting at least half that money in the broadband scheme. If they choose to monopolise the UK's phone lines as they do then they should be responsible for the funding, and not look to public 'taxing' to protect their coffers. I don't think anyone truly believes that this 'tax' will actually be, let alone stay for any length of time, a sum of £6.00 per year.
Posted by Lee Meadows, 14 Jul 2009
Broadband Tax
I, for one, will rapidly switch to mobile broadband if this is implemented. Tax, tax, tax!!! When will any politician ask their electorate what THEY want?
Posted by Marcus DW, 17 Jul 2009
Phone tax
,I am quite attracted to this. Its not a lot of money but will raise enough to employ a considerable number of people without any additional public borrowing. I am, by the way, an impecunious pensioner. I think we need to tax the very rich more.
Posted by J.Alexander, 18 Jul 2009