Simple clear advice in plain English

Government splits costs of policing illegal file sharing

ISPs will have to pay a quarter of the costs of clamping down on copyright infringement

artist's image of filesharing
peer2peer/filesharing-p2p

The Government has split the costs of tackling online copyright infringement between rights holders and internet service providers (ISPs) at a ratio of 75:25 respectively.

The decision applies to both the notification and appeals process. The Department of Business, Innovation and Skills (Bis) also said that consumers accused of copyright infringement won't initially be charged for using the appeals process, but a fee could be introduced at a later date.

Ed Vaizey, Minister for Communications, said: “The Digital Economy Act serves to reduce online copyright infringement through a fair and robust process and at the same time provides breathing space to develop better business models for consumers who buy music, films and books online.”

However the Internet Service Providers Association (Ispa) criticised the move to force ISPs to pay part of the bill.

Nicholas Lansman, Ispa secretary general said: "Ispa has consistently argued for the 'beneficiary pays' principle and is disappointed with today's announcement. Full cost recovery for serious law enforcement cases is an established rule and Ispa sees no reason why it should not be the case here.”

The Open Rights Group (Org) also warned that forcing ISPs to bear some of the costs would lead to higher costs for internet access as companies pass on the charges.

The Government will now notify the European Commission before its decision is introduced in Parliament as a Statutory Order.

Ofcom said that it is still consulting organisations on the setup of an independent appeals body and it would announce progress when it publishes its Online Copyright Infringement Initial Obligations Code this autumn. This code will implement the notifications process and come into force in the first half of 2011.

Article tags

Reader Comments

Ridiculous

The entire cost should be born by the copyright holders. Crowbar manufacturers dont have to contribute to the cost of Policing burglars. Whats next CD/DVD suppliers being taxed because of how some people use their product

Posted by Gary Burton, 14 Sep 2010

   

Add your comment

All fields must be completed. Your email address will not be displayed or used to send marketing messages.

All messages will be checked by moderators before appearing on the site.

See our Privacy Policy for more information.

Related articles

Call to repeal parts of Digital Economy Act gets lukewarm response

MP lodges Early Day Motion to get rid of some of the more controversial clauses in new law

BT and Talktalk in legal challenge to Digital Ecomony Act

Leading ISPs are concerned measures against alleged illegal file sharers would breach current European laws

Mandelson wins 'internet villain' award

Lord Mandelson gets award as a result of his actions regarding the Digital Economy Act

Question & Answer

Q.Why are some of the keys on my keyboard doing strange...

> Read the answer

Q.Is my phone’s Bluetooth any use?

> Read the answer

Q.Can I switch boot drives so that I can work on older...

> Read the answer

Best deals on the web

img

Samsung RV520-A07

£359.98- Buy it now

img

Acer Aspire 5750G (LX.RXP02.019)

£399.99- Buy it now

img

Apple MacBook Pro (MD313B/A)

£904.37- Buy it now

Latest issue & subscription deals

Poll

Are you concerned about viruses that target mobile phones?

Jargon Buster

Computing terms explained in plain English

CAD

Computer Aided Design. Software used to create 3D models.

Great shopping deals from Computeractive