Bill passes through house despite repeated complaints that it was unnecessarily rushed
As predicted yesterday the Government's Digital Economy Bill passed through the House of Commons late last night in the end-of-Parliament wash-up process.
The bill, which includes measures that could require internet service providers (ISPs) to send warning letters to or even disconnect those accused of repeatedly sharing copyrighted material, was passed by 197 votes to 40.
Although the controversial Clause 18 of the bill, related to the blocking of websites sharing copyrighted material, was dropped, it was effectively replaced by an amendment to Clause 8 of the bill.
This makes provision for an injunction to block any "location on the internet which the court is satisfied has been, is being or is likely to be used for or in connection with an activity that infringes copyright".
As in its second reading on Tuesday, the bill was attacked by several members of the house. John Hemming, Liberal Democrat MP for Birmingham Yardley started his speech by noting that he should declare some interests in the matter.
"I am a member of the BPI, the Performing Rights Society and the Musicians Union, and I have also run e-commerce companies for more than ten years", he stated, before noting that "The Bill is a complete mess".
He raised the possibility that the clause allowing injunctions to block websites that host copyrighted material could be used to restrict access to sites such as Wikileaks.
Financial Secretary to the Treasury Stephen Timms MP later noted that "we do not want the clause to be used to restrict freedom of speech".
The amendment to Clause 8, however, demands only that the courts should " have regard" to "the importance of preserving human rights, including freedom of expression" when considering such injunctions.
Andrew Heany of the ISP TalkTalk, which has campaigned against the bill, said that the Bill as passed was "in much better shape than when first tabled by the Government last year" but still contained "draconian proposals".
He said the company "would continue to battle against these oppressive proposals", many of which will require further legislation to implement.
The Conservatives have pledged to review the legislation in the next parliament should it turn out to be flawed and if they win the General Election.
Related articles
Q.Can I switch boot drives so that I can work on older...
Q.Can I open my old genealogy files or have they gone...
Q.Why are odd patterns appearing on my monitors shortly...
An ultrabook laptop at an incredibly low price
|
|
|
|
|
Computeractive Excel (2010) Online tutorialPrice: £19.99 |
Computeractive Word (2010) Online TutorialPrice: £19.99 |
Computeractive Powerpoint (2010) Online TutorialPrice: £19.99 |
Angry BirdsPrice: £9.99 |
Back Issue CD-Rom 14 (2011)Price: £15.99 |
Current Government
This is the most evil,greedy,controlling,repressive government we have had since that of Oliver Cromwell.TIME FOR A CHANGE !!!
Posted by Gil Henderson, 10 Apr 2010
the new bill
I take it that like the scandle over expences, the young members of those in power, will of course be exempt of this law, just as the majority of MP's are of the laws of fraud. first those in power have to put their own houses in order before prejudging other thoughout the digital world!!!!!
Posted by E.T., 10 Apr 2010
Even Bigger Brother
I hope every hacker and virus merchant is waiting in anticipation to screw what ever goverment takes power and deems it necessary to keep this restrictive power in force, because we all know that they will. Regardless of what the people say or want
Posted by Chris Cowley, 12 Apr 2010