The debate continues over what ISPs should be doing to protect kids from adult content
A cross-party Parliamentary inquiry into child protection online has renewed calls for the blocking of adult content on the internet.
The Independent Parliamentary Inquiry into Online Child Protection found that children were easily accessing pornography online and said that exposure to it was having a ‘negative impact' on attitudes towards sex, relationships and body image.
It called on the Government to once again consider a compulsory opt-in scheme for accessing adult content online. The inquiry also recommended that all public Wifi networks should have a ‘default adult-content bar'.
While the inquiry noted efforts from internet service providers (ISPs) to implement parental controls, it claimed more needs to be done. It said that within the next 12 months, ISPs should introduce a ‘single account network filter' to ensure that adult content can be blocked from all devices on a network.
The UK's four biggest ISPs, BT, Sky, Talk Talk and Virgin have all signed up to a code of conduct, which requires new customers to choose if they want adult content filtering on their internet account
Conservative MP and chairwoman of the inquiry Claire Perry said that people found it difficult to understand how to block adult content and that ISPs needed to do more to keep children safe:
"While parents should be responsible for their children's online safety, in practice people find it difficult to put content filters on the plethora of internet-enabled devices in their homes, plus families lack the right information and education on internet safety.
"It's time that Britain's internet service providers, who make more than £3 billion a year from selling internet access services, took on more of the responsibility to keep children safe, and the Government needs to send a strong message that this is what we all expect."
During the inquiry, MPs heard evidence from ISPs, pornographers, child-protection groups and Deidre Sanders, Agony Aunt for The Sun newspaper.
Ms Sanders said that people were now accessing pornography at younger ages:
"I am hearing from a 13-year-old girl being pressured into trying a threesome; the mind boggles, really. There is certain behaviour I only used to have bald 40-year-olds asking me about it, now under-16s are thinking about it."
Jerry Barnett, managing director of adult-pornography website Strictly Broadband, said that the adult-entertainment industry would ‘love to see the free material vanish' and sell pornography ‘at higher prices', thus making it less accessible to children.
The report, sponsored by a religious media organisation called Premier Christian Media, comes off the back of numerous stories about porn-blocking in the UK.
Earlier this month a Private Members' Bill called for ISPs to block pornography, while in October last year internet providers reacted angrily to inaccurate reports about adult content blocking.
Article tags
Related articles
Content Recommendation
Q.Why is Windows Backup skipping files?
Q.Why do my scanned documents display gibberish?
Q.How can I convert MTS files to edit in Windows Movie...
Updating your subscription status
Its not the ISPs job or responsibility
end of the day it's the responsibility of the PARENTS to block access to inappropriate sites and content not the ISPs, end of the day the buck and the responsibility stops with the parents, the "lack of knowledge" is the parents responsibility to fix hell how much intelligence does it take to goto www.google.com and searching for parental control and content filtering software? or look in a mobil phone instruction book on how to enable parental controls? end of the day it boils down to sheer laziness on the parents part they dont want to take the time, effort or responsibility to learn how to do this and want to pass that responsibility off onto someone else.
Posted by Iain Turnbull, 19 Apr 2012