Simple clear advice in plain English

Sony fined £250,000 by ICO for serious data breach

Privacy watchdog says Sony failed to keep its software and security procedures up-to-date and compromised millions of people's personal information

Man in balaclava using laptop
Hackers got access to millions of Sony customers' personal information

Sony has been fined £250,000 by the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) for a "serious breach" of the Data Protection Act (DPA) during which millions of customers' personal details were compromised.

The entertainment company was severely criticised by the privacy watchdog for not being able to prevent the attack on its PlayStation network platform in April 2011.The hackers were able to get access to people's names, addresses, email addresses, dates of birth and account passwords. The regulator said customers' payment card details were also at risk.

Read more: Privacy news | Security guides

David Smith, Deputy Commissioner and Director of Data Protection, said: "The penalty we've issued today is clearly substantial, but we make no apologies for that.

"The case is one of the most serious ever reported to us. It directly affected a huge number of consumers, and at the very least put them at risk of identity theft."

Companies holding and processing people's personal data must ensure that this information is kept as secure as possible. Known as data controllers they must keep up with technological advances and increasingly sophisticated online threats.

Sony failed in this department when it was hit by a series of 'denial of service' attacks in April 2011.

The attacker(s) accessed the personal data, which the ICO noted in some cases had been used by customers and Sony to control access to other online and offline services. The privacy watchdog placed the blame for this breach squarely on Sony's shoulders.

The ICO said it found that Sony's software was not up to date. It also pointed out that technical developments meant passwords were not secure. If these flaws had not been there, the ICO said the attack could have been prevented.

Smith said: "If you are responsible for so many payment card details and log-in details then keeping that personal data secure has to be your priority. In this case that just didn't happen, and when the database was targeted – albeit in a determined criminal attack – the security measures in place were simply not good enough.

"There's no disguising that this is a business that should have known better. It is a company that trades on its technical expertise, and there's no doubt in my mind that they had access to both the technical knowledge and the resources to keep this information safe."

Following the breach, Sony rebuilt its Network Platform to ensure that the personal information it processes is kept secure.

According to the ICO there was one positive outcome from this high profile attack.

"If there's any bright side to this it's that a PR Week poll shortly after the breach found the case had left 77 per cent of consumers more cautious about giving their personal details to other websites.

"Companies certainly need to get their act together but we all need to be careful about who we disclose our personal information to," added Smith.

Reader Comments

Petty cash!

£250,000?? A slap on the wrist - Sony will pay that out of petty cash and never notice.

Posted by John, 25 Jan 2013

   

Add your comment

Please keep comments constructive and free from abuse of any kind and swearing. If you wish to link to a product or service online, please do so in such a way that makes it clear that it is not spam. If you are connected to any such product you should make that clear.

We may use your comments in the magazine. We may edit your comments for clarity or to remove unacceptable material. We will attribute your comments but not share your email address.

We request your email address and record your Internet Address (IP address) in order to block spam from our site. We will never share this information without your permission.

All comments are reviewed by the Computeractive Team before being published. Please bear with the slight delay this causes, you don't need to post more than once.

Click here to read our Privacy Policy

Click here to read our site Terms & Conditions

Related articles

fraud45

ICO calls for prison sentences for serious personal data breaches

Courts should have the power to imprison those involved in serious breaches of the Data Protection Act, according to the Information Commissioner

cloud-security-concept

ICO says companies fail to check cloud storage security

Privacy watchdog says companies forget their legal responsibility for the security of any data they outsource

privacy-image-sew

ICO fines NHS trust for publishing staff's personal information

Torquay Health Trust accidentally publishes staff details online

Content Recommendation

Question & Answer

Q.Why is Windows Backup skipping files?

> Read the answer

Q.Why do my scanned documents display gibberish?

> Read the answer

Q.How can I convert MTS files to edit in Windows Movie...

> Read the answer

Best deals on the web

img

Samsung NP350E7C-A04UK

£349.99- Buy it now

img

Toshiba Satellite C850D-11Q (PSCC2E-00R00JEN)

£299.97- Buy it now

img

Lenovo G580 (MAANJUK)

£379.99- Buy it now

Updating your subscription status Loading

Most popular articles

No matching document

Poll

Do you have Windows 8?

Jargon Buster

Computing terms explained in plain English

Restore Point

A Windows backup of system files and settings.

Great shopping deals from Computeractive

Information currently unavailable