A sumamry of ideas discussed at the Westminster eForum on broadband
Ofcom is currently consulting with the broadband industry to investigate the best way of changing the UK's telecoms ionfrastructure so it is suitable for very high-bandwidth internet services.
The growing popularity of online video means that more data is downloaded to home PCs every day, the volume of which puts the main BT network and the local networks of copper cables from exchanges to homes under strain.
Making sure that Britain can keep up with its international neighbours is important for businesses and consumers alike. That means new networks connecting homes and business premises to the internet are need, with greater capacity for more data that can be delivered even faster.
Network choices
There are various ways to deliver very-high speed broadband; the most obvious is
to run a fibre optic cable to each home; this is also very expensive. Another
possibility is to run the high-capacity fibre to small cabinets in each street,
with households connected to it by their phone line. This is similar to what the
cable company Virgin Media currently does and would lessen the problem of
signals degrading when the home is far from the telephone exchange.
Wireless presents another potential solution, with Wimax and 3G (the technology behind mobile broadband) touted as possible answers, especially for areas where cable and DSL are currently hard to come by. But Wimax base stations would still need to have high-caopacity fibre optic cable connecting them to the main BT network.
Civil engineering - mainly the digging required to lay new cables - is a huge part of the cost. Other proposals include building the networks slowly by upgrading the cable ducts buried in the ground each time roadworks are carried out, or by using the existing gas, electricity and even the sewage networks to get high-capacity cabling into homes. New forms of underground duct design could enable companies to upgrade or install new cabling cheaply (in comparison with digging new trenches).
Another possibility is that towns and cities could co-fund the building of new networks with some of the bigger communications companies, such as BT. The problem here is that the more 'islands' of next gebneration broadband there are, the more difficult it becomes for them to interconnect with each other. The result could be what has happened in the Hull area, where the incumbent telecoms company, Kingston Communications, runs the only network available to consumers.
Peter Phillips, Ofcom's head of strategy, said he believed a mixture of all these technologies and more would eventually deliver what the UK needs but was clear that at this time Ofcom would not intervene to instruct companies to build new networks, and nor would government money be invested.
Article tags
Related articles
Q.How do I store musician and other information about...
Q.Why can't my browser find the website address I typed...
Q.All updates have been downloaded, so why won't Windows...
|
|
|
|
|
Nikon Coolpix S570 BlackPrice: £66.99 |
Computeractive Ultimate Guide - Storage, Sharing & BackupPrice: £5.99 |
Back Issue CD-Rom 13 (2010)Price: £14.99 |
Hallmark Card Studio DeluxePrice: £15.31 |
Marine AquariumPrice: £15.41 |
Kingston charges helpless customers more than elsewhere in the UK
It amazes me that the monopoly enjoyed by KC in Hull, with charges much higher than outside Hull, are not construed as an abuse of a monopoly position by the authorities paid for by the taxpayers to protect their interests. Please define monopoly for Ofcom and other relevant authorities
Posted by Ann Francis, 22 Nov 2007
ISP's must focus on end-to-end quality
Never mind downloading whole films, what most users are doing today is downloading video clips from YouTube or whatever. The trouble is, particularly if you?re trying to do it in the early evening, that the connection stammers along about 64kbps if you?re lucky, which makes viewing in anything like real time a pretty frustrating experience. The problem is not with my local connection, which is perfectly capable of supporting 2Mbps or more, it?s with the total load on the network. If I could get a service which guaranteed me 256kbps end-to-end I would be much better off in real-life terms for what I want to do today. ISPs need to start focusing on end-to-end quality of service supporting real applications rather than the largely pointless speed race.
Posted by Richard Calhoun, 11 Dec 2007
broadband infrastructure
if broadband users are expecting isp`s to improve the current infractructure, i`m afraid they are in for a long wait. isp`s are quite happy to go along with the present set-up as long as the consumer continues to pay for a delapidated network. their hand will have to be forced by government legislation. the government should have taken this initiatiave a long time ago.
Posted by john moffat, 29 Jan 2008