It can be hard to understand processor jargon. We explain what the specifications mean and how to pick the right one
Ever since the first personal computers appeared, manufacturers have enjoyed publicising the importance of the processors used inside.
Even today it’s rare to see an advert for a computer that doesn’t make a big deal of the new processor used inside.
Unfortunately, the processor names and specifications given in adverts can be confusing or even misleading. Here we’ll demystify the processor, explaining what all the specifications included in adverts actually mean.
Back to basics
The processor is often described as the brain of a computer. When the user does
anything on the computer, from typing a document to playing solitaire, the
computer’s processor does the work required to make letters appear on screen and
check the spelling, or to shuffle the deck of cards.
The surprising thing about any processor, though, is the very limited number of things it can do. Despite being used for millions of different tasks, the processor inside a modern PC knows how to perform only a few hundred basic operations. This means something that looks quite simple on screen, such as opening a web page, requires the processor to do thousands or even millions of tiny calculations, all of which add up to the change on screen.
Everybody Hertz
With most tasks requiring the processor to perform thousands of operations,
processors have to perform these operations extremely quickly. In fact, today’s
processors run at mind-boggling speed. The speed of a processor is measured in
Hertz. A standard processor running at one Hertz would perform one calculation
every second, but this would be far too slow for most uses. In the early 1970s
Intel produced a processor that could run at 740 Kilohertz - that is, it could
perform 740,000 calculations every second.
Today, the speed of most processors is measured in Gigahertz, or GHz. A 1GHz processor can perform one billion calculations a second, and today it’s not uncommon to see two or three Gigahertz processors in desktop computers. The speed of a processor measured in Hertz is known as its clock speed, as a tiny circuit inside the processor regulates the process rather like a ticking clock, keeping the processor running at full speed.
Hyperactive
From the 1970s to the early 2000s processors were made faster largely by
increasing the clock speed of each new model. The first IBM Personal Computer,
built in 1981, had a processor that ran at 4.77MHz - that is, it could perform
4,770.000 calculations a second. In 2005 Intel launched its fastest ever Pentium
4 processor. Running at 3.8GHz, the Pentium 4 670 could perform 3,800,000,000
individual calculations every second.
Around the same time as the Pentium 4 processor, however, processor manufacturers began to wonder whether constantly increasing the clock speed at which new processors run was the most effective way to make them more powerful. One alternative method was to increase the amount of cache memory used in new processors.
Related articles
Q.Is my phone’s Bluetooth any use?
Q.Can I switch boot drives so that I can work on older...
Q.Can I open my old genealogy files or have they gone...
Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre launches website and freephone service for missing kids and their families
Grahics Interchange Format. A type of image file often used on the web, but now largely superseded by...
|
|
|
|
|
Computeractive Excel (2010) Online tutorialPrice: £19.99 |
Computeractive Word (2010) Online TutorialPrice: £19.99 |
Computeractive Powerpoint (2010) Online TutorialPrice: £19.99 |
Angry BirdsPrice: £9.99 |
Back Issue CD-Rom 14 (2011)Price: £15.99 |
IDIOTIC, STUPID, FEEBLE-MINDED PUNNING.
This article is well written; but it has been spoilt by the use of feeble-minded, idiotic PUNS which were used in the paragraph headings. Is "Everybody Hertz" supposed to mean "Everybody Hurts?" Those of us who are trained in electronics and radio communications pronounce "Hertz" as "Herr-ts"; so your pun falls flat on its face. The same applies to "Core Blimey". Please REMEMBER that you are imparting new knowledge to those who are reading this article in order to inform themselves about the contents, and ,therefore, the literal meanings of words MUST be used; you are NOT writing an essay in English Literature in a university exam!!
Posted by retyredsoul, 08 Mar 2009
Excellent
I thought it was excellent, the right amount of info, nice and easy to understand. As for the scathing comments from someone who's obviously very well educated but lacking friends and a life, stop being a tw*t and grow up.
Posted by Steve, 04 Aug 2009
I liked the puns!
Helpful info. Thanks.
Posted by H. M. de Bollo, 22 Oct 2009
Every little helps!
Yet some others of us qualified in electronic engineering who spent their early years designing computers don't mind puns at all. As long as people read the stuff and get better informed what more should you ask. I would have liked to see a compariosn table but I realise just how difficult keeping this up to date would be.
Posted by phil, 15 Dec 2009
pc processor
I agree with (retyredsoul)if you are stating facts ,stick to facts
Posted by w.k.bolton, 27 Dec 2009
For goodness sake!
I was also in the business for most of my working life and really can't understand such a pompous reaction, to a couple of mild puns, as retyredsoul's. As phil commented "As long as people read the stuff and get better informed..." the objective is being achieved. I thought the article was a useful introduction to a complex subject.
Posted by Martin, 15 Mar 2010
Focussing on the puns misses a flaw
Whilst the article has got some very informative points in it, it sadly makes one common mistake. Whilst correctly stating that the "instruction set" in a CPU only comprises a few hundred commands, it assumes that processors will perform a calculation per clock cycle. Unfortunatly, most of the commands in the processor take 2, 3, 4 or more clock cycles to execute. Therefore, no processor, from the early 4.77Mhz 286's to the latest ones, can achieve anything like the number of "calculations" as their clock speed. This is why processor benchmarking software like Sisoft etc use MIPS (million instructions per second) as this is more representative of core calculation ability. A 1 Ghz processor will give around 2,500-3,000 calculations per second, a quad core 3.2Ghz around 60,000. The main players Intel and AMD also try to design the processors to complete a given command in less clock cycles. This was one of the core reasons they started using those part numbers different to actual clock speed - to claim their processor would perform faster that the competions for a given clock speed. Anyway, time for me to get a life !
Posted by Peter, 07 Aug 2010