Simple clear advice in plain English

Behaviour-based advertising explained

Find out how websites use advertising

image-of-the-ca-investigates-logo
Follow Computeractive staff on their Twitter pages

On the internet it’s possible to get news, pictures, music, video and all kinds of other information legally and without having to pay for it.

This is made possible by advertising – for example, when you read an article on this website, it appears on your screen along with a couple of advertisements that help us to pay for the site.

With new technology, though, companies can monitor what people do online and send them advertising that is appropriate to them, based on their habits. This ‘behavioural advertising’ has caused a huge amount of controversy – but is it anything to be afraid of?

Everyone’s a winner
The promise of behavioural advertising is that everybody wins. The advertisers get to show more appropriate adverts, so there’s a greater likelihood that they’ll be clicked, making them more effective. The websites stand to make more money from the adverts, which increases their profits. Internet users, meanwhile, don’t get bothered with adverts that aren’t relevant, instead receiving more useful offers and information as well as free access to the site.

Internet Service Providers (ISPs) also stand to benefit. Some behavioural advertising systems, such as the Webwise system developed by Phorm, require special software or equipment to be installed at the ISP, allowing these companies to make money by striking deals with the advertising companies.

So if every party stands to gain from behavioural advertising, why has it caused so much controversy? There are two key issues that cause disagreement: whether users should be concerned about people keeping track of things they do online, and whether they have any choice in the matter.

Cookie monsters
It’s important to note that the idea of websites tracking where you surf online is not new. For years websites have used a technology called cookies to keep track of what their users do. These can track how often you visit a site, or which pages you view, but they are normally limited to a single website or a group of sites owned by one company. They’re largely innocuous, although some security software will classify them as harmful and remove them, and it’s easy to delete or block any cookies you don’t want.

Cookies should not be confused with adware – software that is installed on your PC and snoops on what you’re up to in order to display ads. This can normally be removed by internet security software. In general, though, both cookies and adware can be easily removed from your PC if you wish, leaving you in full control.

Your browsing can also be tracked by websites such as search engines. Google, for instance, monitors the words and phrases you search for, and uses this to display relevant adverts to the right of the search results.

This kind of technology isn’t reserved to search pages, either: when the Google Mail service was set up in 2004 the company made waves by announcing that it would subsidise it through targeted advertising. It reads emails that are sent or received by Google Mail addresses and displays advertising appropriate to the emails’ content.

If you have a Google Mail account it’s easy to see this working – log in and read an email, and you will usually see an advertisement on the page that bears some relevance to your message. If you’re emailing friends about booking a holiday, for instance, you may see adverts from travel companies.

Google promises that this is all done anonymously and that individual users aren’t being tracked but, in any case, with search engines users have a choice – if you don’t like the idea of Google Mail’s computers reading your messages, you’re free to find a different email service.

Reader Comments

Repeats the myth that Google Mail offers a choice

I don't use Google Mail, I never will. I don't want Google reading my emails. However colleagues, customers and friends have chosen to use Gmail. I therefore have no choice, but to send emails to their Gmail addresses, at which point Google will intercept and read the email I sent, without my consent, without informing me. I cannot opt out of this, even if I wanted to.

Posted by Nym, 10 Nov 2009

Confirmed? Really?

'This has been confirmed by the UK regulatory authorities' There has been NO such confirmation by UK authorities. At best they have said that phorm MAY be legal if certain conditions are met, not that it actually is.

Posted by Patrick, 19 Nov 2009

   

Add your comment

All fields must be completed. Your email address will not be displayed or used to send marketing messages.

All messages will be checked by moderators before appearing on the site.

See our Privacy Policy for more information.

Related articles

Phorm given the green light by UK Government

Controversial advert targeting system can continue to operate as long as it follows certain rules

EU scrutinises web monitoring technology

EU Commission asks UK Government whether Phorm system satisfies data protection laws

ICO to monitor latest BT Phorm trial

Privacy watchdog to oversee trial of online ad system this month

Question & Answer

Q.Why are some of the keys on my keyboard doing strange...

> Read the answer

Q.Is my phone’s Bluetooth any use?

> Read the answer

Q.Can I switch boot drives so that I can work on older...

> Read the answer

Best deals on the web

img

Samsung RV520-A07

£359.98- Buy it now

img

Acer Aspire 5750G (LX.RXP02.019)

£399.99- Buy it now

img

Apple MacBook Pro (MD313B/A)

£904.37- Buy it now

Latest issue & subscription deals

Poll

Are you concerned about viruses that target mobile phones?

Jargon Buster

Computing terms explained in plain English

Bios

Basic Input Output System. Essential software built into every PC that connects the vital components....

Great shopping deals from Computeractive