Simple clear advice in plain English

Microsoft Windows 7 preview

As the seventh major version of Windows prepares for launch, we give you a sneak preview of the changes ­ and ask whether Microsoft has learned the lessons of Vista

windows-7-image
Windows 7 has some useful new features

Windows 7 is nearly upon us; the word is that the first PCs with the new operating system pre-installed could be in the shops in time for Christmas. That would make it a little less than three years since Microsoft brought Vista into the world, promising PC buyers the ‘wow factor’.

Take a look at our free video highlighting the new Windows 7 desktop and some of the operating system's main features.

But Vista has proven to be at least partly a failure. Sales of new PCs with Vista may have broken previous records but that’s more to do with demand for new PCs than love for the software.

The truth behind Vista’s poor reception is that the company promised much and delivered relatively little, which is a shame as some genuinely interesting and useful tools have been overshadowed by a trio of flaws: poor performance; early lack of support for peripherals and software from other companies; and an interface that was a little over-keen to tell users what it was up to.

While many issues were dealt with by the first Vista service pack (a large update that contained fixes and updates for Windows or other programs), Vista has been unable to recover from the blow of so much bad publicity so soon.

So join us as we take a look at what’s new in Windows 7 and consider whether the company has got it right this time.

Warmed-up Windows?
One of the early criticisms of Windows 7 is that it is merely Vista reheated ­ and the critics have a case. Even Microsoft says the architecture (the ‘engine’ of the software) is basically unchanged.

The new features in the version we examined are low key and the company is betting that users would rather have an operating system that’s familiar but smoother and less annoying rather than one that rewrites the Windows rules again.

The truth is that Vista was produced in a bit of a rush, mainly because Microsoft spent years going down the wrong track with a version of Windows built more deeply on something called the .Net (pronounced ‘dot net) Framework, which is a set of tools that was supposed to help companies write very efficient and visually stunning applications for Windows.

For reasons too dull to go into here, that work had to be undone. Further time was spent trying to improve security features in Windows XP as it came under unprecedented attack from hackers and criminals.

This led to XP Service Pack 2 but reduced the resources available to build Vista. With Vista making a belated entrance, one significant consequence was that manufacturers of peripherals did not have enough time to ensure their devices would work with it properly.

Another Vista problem is the security feature called User Account Control (UAC), which is on by default. This is widely disliked because it prompts the user with lots of annoying messages when they perform certain tasks or try to install and update applications.

The real purpose of User Account Control is to solve a long-standing Windows problem, which is that it did not properly separate system files, application files, and user data, making it unsecure and hard to manage.

Although Microsoft long ago laid down guidelines intended to fix this, too many software companies ignored them, and even some Microsoft applications do not behave as they should. UAC solves most of those problems, though there can still be compatibility problems.

The bottom line is that while UAC is a really important evolution for Windows, for the user it is nothing more than annoying; it is seen as a burden rather than a benefit. Windows 7 reduces the impact of UAC on the user while preserving most of its value, although the success of this will only become apparent when Windows 7-compatible software starts to appear.

Article tags

Reader Comments

It's just Vista with a new skin

Let's face it, Vista is rubbish. So reworking it with a different 'skin' isn't going to tempt me away from XP, ever.

Posted by Alan, 19 Mar 2009

Yet Another Change?

How many more times do the public have to purchase, either a new computer or, a new opperating system, before we get something like a good system? I personaly am fed up of spending good money, just to find out that some of my favoriet software is not compatible and is usless to me, for example, I have Adobe Acrobat 6, guess what, it is not compatible with Vista, money wasted yet again!!!!!!

Posted by P. Davies, 21 Mar 2009

Windows 7 Trial Version

Hi, I have suffered a complete system failure on my XP desktop due to softwear incompatability/and or disc failure. In desperation tried Windows 7 and replacement disk. What a revelation----printers auto detected and drivers auto updated same wilh mouse, webcam and audio system . Even internet connection completed and running. OK its only a trial version and some security apps drivers cause slow downs BUT its got me up and running-------I'll certainly buy the full version.

Posted by George BARTON, 25 Mar 2009

Leave Vista alone!

I was slow to move from WinME and Win2000 to XP and suffered the same problems as many others did when it was new and only made the move fully once sp1 was readily available. But, for me Vista is a different proposition. I installed Vista Home Basic on my old Centrino laptop (as a test) dual booting with WinXP Home; and I must say XP hardly gets a look in now. The laptop spec is pretty basic: Evesham Voyager X3 725 Intel Centrino 1.6ghz @400mhz 2mb L2 1Gb (2x512) PC2700 (DDR333) Tosh MK8032GAX ATA Harddrive Graphics is integrated Intel(R) 82852/82855 GM/GME Graphics Controller using 32mb of system memory; all rating 1.0 on Windows Experience Index. So nothing great there then but, I have to say, it runs smoother and faster than it does using XP. The best OS I?ve used ? ever! So to all you Vista knockers out there ? Leave Vista alone!!!

Posted by Jason Walker, 31 Mar 2009

whats wrong with vista?

I had a mac, win 96se then xp and now have vista and I think its the best of the lot. Ok I have uac switched off but then, I can switch it off. I still have xp on my laptop, but always prefer the vista. Perhaps being a senior, I'm 72, makes me appreciate how good vista is lol

Posted by uksenior, 27 Aug 2009

   

Add your comment

All fields must be completed. Your email address will not be displayed or used to send marketing messages.

All messages will be checked by moderators before appearing on the site.

See our Privacy Policy for more information.

Related articles

Speed up your PC illustration

30 tips to help you get your PC back up to its original speed

Software problems may be the cause of a computer running more slowly than it should, but there are some free tools you can try to improve things

Word's undo feature

How to fix common PC errors

It’s easy to hit the wrong key when using a PC and throw yourself into a panic. There's no need to worry - we have easy fixes for 30 common everyday errors

Some graphics card drivers can flip your monitor display sideways

Your PC software problems solved

We offer advice on expanding your taskbar, email in Windows 7, upgrading from Vista to Windows 7, ejecting memory keys and improving MP3 sound quality

Question & Answer

Q.How do I store musician and other information about...

> Read the answer

Q.Why can't my browser find the website address I typed...

> Read the answer

Q.All updates have been downloaded, so why won't Windows...

> Read the answer

Best deals on the web

img

Apple MacBook Pro (MC724LL/A)

£999.99- Buy it now

img

Sony Vaio VPCF23P1E/B

£679.98- Buy it now

img

Samsung 300E5A-A01DX

£449.99- Buy it now

Great benefits for subscribers!

Most popular articles

Poll

Which is your preferred web browser

Jargon Buster

Computing terms explained in plain English

GIF

Grahics Interchange Format. A type of image file often used on the web, but now largely superseded by...

Great shopping deals from Computeractive