Simple clear advice in plain English

Panasonic Lumix GH1

An SLR-lookalike camera that shoots both photos and video

image-of-the-panasonic-lumix-gh1

At £1,300, Panasonic’s Lumix GH1 is an unusual digital camera. Most cameras that cost this much are known as Single Lens Reflex (SLR) cameras. They have an optical viewfinder that shows the scene through the camera lens before you shoot, and lenses that can be swapped.

The GH1 has swappable lenses, but no optical viewfinder: the viewfinder is electronic, using a second LCD screen, which makes the camera smaller and lighter than most SLRs.

The GH1’s electronic viewfinder is the best of its kind we’ve seen so far. We found that composing shots in daylight was almost as easy as with a similarly priced SLR, with the picture sharp enough to allow us check for focus and with very little shutter lag. In the dark, however, it became harder and more frustrating to frame shots quickly, and we missed having a proper optical system.

One nice touch is the button that switches the viewfinder between a classic SLR-like view, with information below, and one with more information overlaid on the image. The rear screen pivots on its left edge, allowing composition from just about any angle.

The GH1’s mode wheel offers all the shooting modes you would expect from an SLR, and oddly there’s a second wheel that offers only a choice between the three focus modes. The camera auto-focuses using the contrast detection method used by most compact cameras rather than the phase-detection system available on SLRs. This has the advantage of allowing clever features such as face tracking, but it’s not always as swift and assured as the autofocus on a good SLR.

Photos taken using the GH1 and its 14-140mm stabilised kit lens were well exposed and sharp. The stabilised zoom allows for snapping at a great distance, but with a maximum aperture of f/4 at the wide end of the lens we struggled to create pleasantly blurred backgrounds on portrait photos. The lack of a dedicated exposure compensation button is an annoyance when shooting stills, however, especially as there is a pointless 'film mode' button taking up space on the camera top. The camera takes Micro Four Thirds lenses, which are relatively rare at the moment, but adapters allow the use of Olympus Four Thirds lenses as well.

The GH1 comes into its own, however, when shooting video. It can record video in high definition and save it as either AVCHD or motion-JPEG files: movie buffs will want to know that it can handle both 720p and 1080i, although oddly the 1080i movies are captured at 25fps progressive and converted in the camera to 50fps interlaced. You’ll need a tripod to get good shots, but we were impressed by the quality on offer. What’s more, unlike many digital SLRs we’ve seen that record HD video, the GH1 can auto-focus while shooting. It has a stereo microphone on top, and there’s a socket for an external microphone too.

And these great movie functions help make up for the occasional still-photo annoyances, but leave the GH1 as a very odd proposition. If you want to make creative home movies in HD it’s the best camera we’ve seen by some margin, but you’ll need a decent budget to afford one.

If you’ll be mainly shooting stills, however, we would recommend picking a proper SLR that can use the more plentiful Canon EOS or Nikon F-mount lenses.

Read more reviews

Reader Comments

Horrible colour!!

What a horrible colour for a camera? Keep the camera black. Any other colour makes it look tacky.

Posted by Snapper, 14 Sep 2009

Lumix GH1

Go for the G1, it does not have the video but provides excellent photos. Any sane person wanting video would purchase a video camera not an excuse for one.

Posted by David French, 21 Sep 2009

SOme concerns about sharpness

Have shot 2000 photos w/ GH-1, overall focus is little bit soft. However, compared to canon t1i (with 28-70(?) and 70-300(?)) kit lenses, Canon was not much sharper side-by-side. Canon was a bit sharper at telephoto end of zoom though, though not by much. While I really like just about everything else about the camera, focus does cause a lot of concern, as a shaprer picture was what I was seeking in upgrading from s3 is. Video is hands down the best on any DSLR I tried under $2k USD. Overall package is really teriffic and the flexibility of going from still to HD video is really allowing me to do things I could not do if I carried separate camcorder -- like ziplining.

Posted by jimbo, 06 Dec 2009

display:none  

Add your comment

All fields must be completed. Your email address will not be displayed or used to send marketing messages.

All messages will be checked by moderators before appearing on the site.

See our Privacy Policy for more information.

Our verdict

img

Superb for shooting HD video, but not so great for stills Good points Shoots 720p/1080i video with autofocus; interchangeable lenses Bad points No optical viewfinder; Micro Four Thirds mount; expensive

Best price on the web

Manufacturer

Panasonic

Latest issue & subscription deals

No matching document

Poll

Are you concerned about viruses that target mobile phones?

Jargon Buster

Computing terms explained in plain English

GIF

Grahics Interchange Format. A type of image file often used on the web, but now largely superseded by...

Great shopping deals from Computeractive