An easy way to scan old slides and negatives
So popular and widespread are digital cameras that it’s easy to forget there was once a time when photos meant a set of prints along with negatives, or slides.
But many people still have vast collections of either or both of these and Veho’s compact scanner offers a convenient way to preserve those pictures.
It has a striking design, looking much better than most traditional flatbed scanners, and will fit easily on a desk.
The main unit is fairly small and compact, but feels very solidly built, aside from one rather flimsy button. It’s designed to work with the included software from ArcSoft to get your pictures scanned and fixed - to get rid of dust marks and scratches, for example - with minimal drama. And this it is able to achieve quite comfortably - the setup process was commendably simple and the software intuitive. The included trays can be loaded with either with negatives or slides, and they are scanned from there, one at a time.
This is much faster than scanning prints, plus it has the added advantage of not recreating any imperfections (such as scratches) that a print may have picked up over the years, so even if you're not someone who's kept their negatives untouched and in the envelope with the prints, it might still be fine.
One minor gripe is that if the negatives have been poorly cut, they may not fit properly into the tray, which means it's necessary to crop the image after scanning. The biggest problem is that the software is rather limited, although it is very easy to use. This was a problem because quite often with scanned slides the colour reproduction is slightly off, so you need to use the software to correct the colours. It is possible to scan slides straight into Adobe Photoshop Elements, which was more effective.
Another important point is that the documentation uses an astonishingly small font to guide users through the setup process. We’d defy anyone to be able to read the included instructions comfortably - we certainly couldn’t - so it’s a good thing the initial setup process was so easy.
Vista compatible: Yes
Read more reviews
Good points
Ticket-reselling company advises users not to click on links in emails from the company, allegedly offering an Adobe PDF, that is sent by cyber criminals
Basic Input Output System. Essential software built into every PC that connects the vital components....
|
|
|
|
|
Nikon Coolpix S570 BlackPrice: £66.99 |
Computeractive Ultimate Guide - Storage, Sharing & BackupPrice: £5.99 |
Back Issue CD-Rom 13 (2010)Price: £9.99 |
Hallmark Card Studio DeluxePrice: £15.31 |
Marine AquariumPrice: £15.41 |
Not worth it
Scanner consistantly overexposes color slide images resulting in washed out faces and white or near white areas of the slide. DON'T waste your money if you want usable images
Posted by Joe S., 19 Jun 2008
NO customer support
Despite three requests for help from customer service, NO REPLY was sent. Once they get your money, it seems to be "go away - you bother us".
Posted by Joe S., 05 Jul 2008
sorry guys ...
poor image quality --- amateurish software. equipment incompatibility with most os's call this a review -- or just a rehash of the manufacturers brochure ??
Posted by andy whitehouse, 20 Nov 2008
Jurys Out
I have inherited this little beast, Firstly before I got my hands on it I read that it wasnt compatible with Vista64 bit. I contacted customer support and recieved reply within the hour, so no complaints there. As for the scanning its fidly the slide holder clip is almost impossible to use and as others have said it does seem to over expose images.
Posted by Paul Ridges, 03 Feb 2009
Deserves a higher rating
The bundled software is the same garbage as is bundled with many digital cameras. It is crap. Throw it away. This is a twain compliant device and can be used with quality software which one would use for any meaningful photo work
Posted by Harvey Schlesinger, 11 Feb 2009
Look elsewhere
I loaded the software into four different machines. On two transference of images to the PC was unbelievably slow . On the other two image transference was quicker but image quality was very poor. This is not a good buy.
Posted by Disappointed buyer, 18 Apr 2009