About RSS
Search for: in 
R E L A T E D   C O N T E N T

Free email newsletters




Jargon Buster

ADVERTISEMENT

Something wiki this way comes

Wikipedia is often the first point of call for anyone looking for information on the web – but is it reliable?

Laura Frewin, Computeract!ve 24 Jan 2007
ADVERTISEMENT

Wikipedia has become one of the most consulted works of reference available in the English language. Compiled not by academics, but by the average Joe and Joanne on the street, Wikipedia is the world’s first collaborative encyclopaedia, where amateur, expert and enthusiast alike are free to create or contribute to entries on topics and people that interest them.

Critics say the information on the site is rarely verified, while fans say the critics are simply missing the point of this online research tool. Join us for a walk on the Wiki side.

‘Wiki’ comes from the Hawaiian phrase wiki wiki, meaning quick, and is also an acronym of ‘what I know is’. The word is synonymous with websites based on open-source software that can be edited quickly and easily by anyone with an interest in a topic. It’s this ability to change articles, in particular, that has attracted the ire of academics.

Certain entries give those with strong opinions the opportunity to score a cheap point. For example, the entry on US President George Bush has been amended with negative, satirical, offensive or plain inaccurate material so many times that new and recently registered users are barred from editing it without permission.

Creating false entries or adding inaccurate information to an existing one is called vandalism in the wiki community, and the site’s founders (the not-for-profit Wikimedia Foundation) encourages all users to report those who vandalise, and to correct entries if they feel qualified to do so.

One of the most notorious examples of this involved a man called Brian Chase, who thought it would be funny to post a hoax biographical entry on John Seigenthaler, a respected journalist and former editor of The Tennessean in the US.

Among other untruths, Mr Chase claimed Mr Seigenthaler was linked to the assassinations of both John and Robert Kennedy. The libellous content went unnoticed for 132 days before it was removed. Mr Chase was tracked down using his IP address, and was forced to resign from his job and make a personal apology.

See also:

It's the internet encyclopaedia that anyone can edit. Here’s how to get involved  06 Sep 2006

All Online
Tags: Features, Wikipedia

Like this story? Spread the news by clicking below:

Post this to Delicious del.icio.us    Post this to Digg Digg this    Post this to reddit reddit!

Permalink for this story
R E A D E R   C O M M E N T S
D I R E C T O R Y
Sponsored links
F E A T U R E D   J O B S
Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom | Grass Roots
SQL Database Administrator - Aylesbury - £DOE Grass Roots are one of the Sunday Times Top 100 companies to work for (2007 and 2008). Established in 1980, we're part of the Grass Roots Group, which is ... more >
London, United Kingdom | Feltham City Learning Centre
ICT Systems Administrator - Feltham City Learning Centre - £23,097 - £24,528 A full time ICT Systems Administrator to work in the Feltham City Learning Centre. This role requires a broad range of ICT skills ... more >
London, United Kingdom | MI5
Programme Managers - Project Managers - Project Support Staff   Getting the best out of technology is critical to helping us protect the UK. Join MI5 and use your skills and experience to help us ... more >
Reading, Berkshire, United Kingdom | EDS
Job Title - Applications Build and Test engineer Short Description: DII The DII project is contracted to supply both hardware and software infrastructure solutions to support the MoD transition to a common base solution, based ... more >
More job opportunities
ADVERTISEMENT
Join our fight for a fair deal when shopping online