While using the internet may make people feel anonymous, in actual fact the
reverse is true.
Every email, forum posting, website visit and download can be logged, stored
and brought up again at a later date.
To add complexity to the problem the international nature of internet traffic
means that other countries’ legal systems may be just as important as UK law if
a case is brought.
In this feature we’ll explain how to stay on the right side of the law and
avoid many of the common pitfalls people fall into to. Safe surfing is perfectly
possible if a few simple guidelines are followed.
Since its inception the internet has run into the same laws that govern the
offline world, and there is now a serious body of case law showing what is, and
is not, acceptable behaviour.
In some cases existing laws have been applied to online behaviour, and in
others new laws have been created to cover the new technology. Although a
British judge was recently found to be ignorant of what a web page actually was,
lawyers across the globe are well aware of internet law and are prepared to
enforce it.
Speak no evil
One of the most common types of legal action taken involving the internet is
libel. This is particularly relevant to Britain because we have a different
approach to libel than most other countries, with the burden of proof on the
defendant to show their comments were true or justified rather than on the
accuser to prove they were maliciously inaccurate.
Payouts for libel also tend to be larger here than in other countries.
The situation is further complicated by the international nature of internet
traffic. Because the internet relies on
servers
around the world it has been argued in legal cases that it is possible to bring
actions in a variety of countries, either because traffic has passed through
their servers or the comments have been read by people in that country.
“All this has led to cases of libel shopping,” said Robert Lands, a partner
in media and internet law at legal firm Finer Stephens Innocent.
“Cases can be bought in this country for actions on websites based in other
countries. If someone sues for libel they’ll do it in this country.”
The laws of libel are relatively simple, and were last updated in the
1996
Defamation Act.
Put simply there are two types of defamation: slander – when defamation is
spoken – and libel – when it is written.
In order to libel someone you have to write something that exposes them to
hatred, ridicule or contempt or harms their business or personal reputation. For
example, if someone was to write that a murderer used to drive while drunk this
would be unlikely to make it to the courts, since his reputation as a killer
would outweigh the accusation of drunk driving.
If the same allegation was made about a racing driver the case would be more
likely to go to court if it were untrue, since it would harm the his
professional as well as personal reputation.
It’s also important to remember that republishing libellous information that
someone else has posted is also an offence. As the legal mantra goes, repetition
is no legal defence.
Reader comments