The terms ‘file sharing’ and ‘peer-to-peer networking’ have some pretty
negative connotations.
In the press, they’re more often than not associated with legal wrangles over
copyright infringement, but you might be surprised to learn that there’s
actually nothing illegal about the peer-to-peer networks themselves and, in
principle, nothing unlawful about using them to share files.
It’s certainly true that many users of peer-to-peer networks continue to
exploit this technology in order to illegally distribute large amounts of
copyrighted material over the internet, but you’ll also find the exact same
technology being used for a great number of perfectly legitimate uses, too.
In this feature we’re going to find out precisely what file sharing is, how
it works and how it can be put to good use, and explain what’s legal and what’s
not.
Caught Napping
At the end of the last millennium an 18-year-old student at Boston’s
Northeastern University created a computer program that would eventually turn
the music industry on its head and pave the way for music and films to be sold
online. The student was
Shawn
Fanning and the program was called
Napster.
At the time, digital music files and players were just beginning to take off.
More and more people were converting their CD collections to a collection of MP3
files on their computer.
Fanning’s reason for creating Napster was simple: he wanted to develop a
network that would link together every user’s digital music collection so that
people could easily share songs, albums and artists’ entire back catalogues with
one another free of charge.
Unlike a traditional website making files available for download, Napster
didn’t actually store the music files itself the files all remained on their
respective owners’ hard disks. Instead, all it did was provide an index, showing
who had a copy of each song.
By installing the Napster program, its users allowed others to download the
songs they had. At the same time, they could search the service for songs that
they wanted, and download them from the other users’ computers.
Share alike
This is the basic principle behind peer-to-peer networking. In simple terms,
peer-to-peer networks don’t need to transfer files and other information through
a central server. Instead, they create a network of direct connections between
individual computers.
And, since the internet is basically a huge number of computers connected
together, file-sharing programs are able to make the connections they need to
transfer music, video or anything else quickly and easily.
This is a great idea, since it means that no single person or organisation
needs to take responsibility for storing the files that users are sharing, and
virtually all the power, bandwidth and storage space involved is being supplied
by the users themselves.
In Napster’s case, however, this technology had some interesting legal
implications. One of the reasons that the service wasn’t shut down straight away
was because, while the act of freely distributing copyrighted material like
digital music files in itself is undeniably illegal, there was no precedent at
the time for deciding the legality of Napster’s involvement in the process.
Since Napster didn’t own, store or distribute the files itself, it was
initially hard to implicate it in any crime.
Since digital copies of copyright-protected records were exchanging hands for
nothing, however, people in the music industry understandably became extremely
worried that the growing practice of file sharing would soon put them out of
business.
It wasn’t long before everyone, from the rock group Metallica to the
Recording
Industry Association of America (RIAA), was on Napster’s back.
After
a series of high-profile court cases, Napster was forced to close its network in
2001, though it resurfaced in a completely different guise some years later
(see ‘New Napster?’ below for details).
Reader comments