Premium-rate phone lines generate enormous income for companies. They are
used to sell goods and services and the cost is charged to phone bills and
pre-pay phone accounts.
Services range from content and services for mobile phones, to telephone
voting so viewers can interact with their favourite TV programmes.
According to analyst
Frost
and Sullivan, revenue in Europe was €2.68bn last year. In the UK alone
nearly £1bn was spent on phone-paid-for content and services.
But as consumers have found out to their cost, this market is littered with
companies whose practices are, to say the least, dubious.
Common complaints include the practice of surreptitiously signing people up
to expensive subscription services for ringtones or games that drain mobile
phone accounts.
More recently we have seen the
fiascos
surrounding competitions and voting call lines run by broadcasters such as
the BBC and ITV.
So who should consumers complain to if they feel they have been ripped off?
Ofcom and Phonepayplus
Under the
Communications
Act 2003,
Ofcom
is the statutory communications regulator that has overall responsibility for
the regulation of premium rate services (PRS).
However, Ofcom decided in December 2007 that an independent regulator,
Phonepayplus,
would act as the agency that carries out the day-to-day regulation of the PRS
market on its behalf.
Phonepayplus was set up in 1986 as Icstis by the telecommunications industry
to protect consumers from unfair trading practices.
It does not receive any Government funding and the money to run the agency
comes from a levy on service providers (companies that sell services or
content). This is collected by network operators such as
BT and
O2.
From time to time its income is supplemented by money from bank interest and
fines or administrative charges collected from service providers who breach
Phonepayplus'
Code of Practice (CoP).
Reader comments