According to the latest study on social networking from digital metrics
specialist
ComScore,
social websites have grown by leaps and bounds during the last year.
MySpace
attracted more than 114 million visitors in June 2007, up 72% on the previous
year, while
Facebook
saw 52.2 million, which equates to a staggering 270% rise. These impressive
statistics bolster the argument that social networking is no passing Web 2.0
fad, but an online activity that is here to stay. But what exactly is social
networking?
Social networking defined
It’s one of those piece of string questions, with the answer varying depending
on who you are talking to and what they expect to get out of it. But whether it
is a business or personal site, every social network requires the same basics to
qualify as such: user profiles, content and a method of allowing users to
connect with each other.
The internet has always offered these things, independently of each other,
arguably starting with Usenet discussion groups some 20 years ago. In 1995 the
self-explanatory
Classmates.com
was probably the first web-based social networking site, followed in 1997 by
SixDegrees.com,
which started using the friend of a friend principle to good effect.
But it wasn’t really until 2002, when technology started to catch up with
desire, that
Friendster
appeared and changed everything by giving users (rather than the
computer-managed environment) control over who they connected with.
Certainly, it was the arrival of Web 2.0 content-driven services (where content
is both created and shared by its users) that enabled social networking sites as
we know them today to prosper.
It is easy to fall into the trap of thinking that social networking sites
such as Facebook and MySpace are nothing more than glorified blogs, but that
would be missing the point.
Yes, most such services provide a web-based outlet for publishing opinion,
but it’s the ease with which this content can be shared among a network of
friends, and the ease with which discovery tools allow that network to be
expanded, that really make social networking the phenomenon it is today.
The true power of social networking sites lies in the ability both to make
connections and to exploit the potential of the knowledge pool created. This
potential is perhaps best exposed when you move out of the realm of the
best-known consumer sites and into the realm of social networking for business.
Although this sounds like something of a misnomer, it actually works remarkably
well in principle. Combining the friends discovery capability of consumer sites
with the “six degrees of separation” concept to build up a business network is a
great way of expanding your business connections with the minimum of effort.
Here’s how it works. You sign up, the system automatically scans your email
address book for people you know who are already members, and you invite them to
connect to your network of contacts. It also gives you limited access to the
networks of each of these people, who you can also invite to join your network,
and so on. The ability to tap into the friends of your friends, and the business
contacts of your business contacts, opens up new relationship opportunities that
just would not be possible in anything other than this web-based environment.
So how do you go about actually building a network of connections at one of
these sites from scratch?
Thankfully you don’t have to hang around like a wallflower at the office
party waiting for someone to ask you to dance. Instead, most services will have
a tool which offers to compare your email address book (web-based services are
the most popular with the personal social networks, while the business-oriented
ones tend to opt for Outlook contacts) with its own list of members.
Hook up
You can then automatically send an invitation there’s usually the option to
customise it and make it a little less impersonal for them to hook up and
connect with your network. The more proactive of services will also give you the
option of sending an email to those people not already members, asking them if
they want to join you and including a direct link to the membership application
page.
Alternatively, you can browse the membership lists of the network you have
joined. This can be accomplished in many different ways, from a precise search
on names (not that successful if you are looking for an Ian Jones, for example)
to email addresses. Some let you search by “network”, which could include a
company you worked for or a university you attended.
One thing that applies equally to all social networking services is that once
you have added a contact or two, things take off exponentially. Immediately, you
have access to the contacts of your contacts, and personal experience suggests
that it really is quite common to discover that you share friends and
colleagues. The logical next step is to invite them to connect with you, and so
the cycle continues.
But what’s it all for?
Services such as
LinkedIn
are an increasingly popular route to finding staff who would simply not
be on a company’s radar otherwise. Indeed, the people who get approached by
someone in a once or twice removed network are often not even actively looking
for a career change.
Startups are able to use the informal handshake of a social networking
environment to break the ice and introduce the possibility of working together.
This is helped by the ability to flag up whether you are “interested in hearing
about new opportunities” within your personal profile on the site.
There is no doubt that the sense of belonging to a networked community means
that even if someone is not interested in a prospective job, they are likely to
be much more polite about turning you down than if they are approached by a
recruitment agent who has found them via a Google search. Social networks allow
a degree of intimacy that moves relationships up a notch from being total
strangers even if they are just that.
But it would be quite wrong to think of social networking purely in terms of
a recruitment playground at one extreme and just a playground at the other. Dig
underneath all the hype and what you actually have here is an entirely new
approach to knowledge exchange.
The wisdom of crowds is perhaps best exemplified by Wikipedia, where entries
can be edited by anyone. Over time and given the number of people who will see
those entries errors are more likely to be removed than to remain.
Social networks allow anyone in a network to tap into the wisdom of crowds,
discovering and accessing information from a friend of a friend and their
friends too for that matter. Providing the tools not only to manage personal
networks, but to extend and leverage them too, is at the heart of the success of
any social networking service. The information professional will quickly
appreciate that, within the domain of people-centric information at any rate,
these networks complement their own skills in the discovery and organisation as
well as application of data.
Commercial companies are starting to use bespoke social networking concepts
within their own communication strategies and services to boost the value of
their interactions with customers and business partners alike. But it is the
world of academia that social networking has really made inroads. Indeed, it was
here that the current media darling of the genre, Facebook, was conceived and
remained exclusively until just a few months ago when it opened its doors to
anyone who wanted to interact.
As well as the obvious community bonding and relationship building advantages
of such a service to the student body and staff alike, social networking is also
proving a useful tool for the admissions department when it comes to student
background research. Using networks popular with teenagers, along with the
standard act of Googling, it is possible to build a reasonably detailed profile
of the candidate’s “real” persona rather than the one carefully displayed at the
interview.
Which brings us nicely to another of the potential pitfalls of social
networking: it exposes the real you to the world. Just as you should never say
something in an email that you wouldn’t be happy shouting to the world at large,
so the same applies with what you say within the boundaries of a social network.
Info pros know only too well how discoverability is no longer a dark art, yet
it remains easy to forget this when caught up in what appears to be a cosy chat
between friends.
Don’t be put off by the media scare stories of predators stalking social
networking sites for vulnerable youngsters to groom or building information
profiles to use in identity theft scams, or that it is just a monumental waste
of teenage time. As usual, the mainstream media look for the tabloid headline
and tend to ignore the underlying good.
In the case of social networking that underlying good cannot be overstated.
It is one of the most efficient ways you can connect with like-minded people
online, and build a network of contacts that you would never normally be able to
reach by any other method.
Reader comments