Find out how different Raid arrays perform read and write actions
Pros and cons of Raid types
Raid 0 is fast and gives you the full capacity of all
your disks, but it has no fault tolerance. It’s best suited only for
non-critical applications.
Raid 1 effectively performs like a single disk in speed and capacity, but the second disk delivers redundancy.
Raid 5 also offers fault tolerance, but makes more efficient use of the space available and offers read performance somewhere between Raid 0 and 1.
On the downside the distribution of parity bits takes its toll on write performance.
If you have three or more identical disks, Raid 5 is a good option for a server that needs protection against disk failure and is predominantly used for delivering data.
Raid 5 could be ideal for a media server although the recording of new TV shows would probably have to take place on a quicker system.
Related articles
Q.Why are some of the keys on my keyboard doing strange...
Q.Is my phone’s Bluetooth any use?
Q.Can I switch boot drives so that I can work on older...
St Helena, a 'small British village' in the mid-Atlantic, is seeking support and funding for a broadband connection
|
|
|
|
|
Computeractive Excel (2010) Online tutorialPrice: £19.99 |
Computeractive Word (2010) Online TutorialPrice: £19.99 |
Computeractive Powerpoint (2010) Online TutorialPrice: £19.99 |
Angry BirdsPrice: £9.99 |
Back Issue CD-Rom 14 (2011)Price: £15.99 |
Great Article!
I have a raid 5 on a home server.... This finally explains why it feels a little bit slow.... Will do my own test to confirm. THANKS!
Posted by Jorge, 08 Apr 2010