Simple clear advice in plain English

Review: Canon Pixma IP2500 inkjet printer

No speed demon, but a decent alternative to high-street printing

There's no shortage of printers under £50 these days, many housing built-in scanners.

Canon's new budget model, the Pixma IP2500, lacks a scan function but is surprisingly good at photo printing.

The shiny black casing gives a good first impression, although it doesn't take long to work out this printer is a budget model.

There's no memory card reader or LCD screen and, thanks to the lack of an output tray, prints simply get spat out onto the table, or possibly the floor. Canon has done a good job of making it compact, though, sitting just 237mm deep.

The printer is served by two cartridges - one containing dedicated black ink, the other a three-ink colour cartridge. The black cartridge (PG-37, £8.99) is rated at 220 pages when printing text, while the colour (CL-38, £11.99) is good for 205 pages or 120 6x4 photos.

High-speed printing is unlikely to be top of your list when opting for a printer in this price bracket, but Canon says the Pixma IP2500 is capable of spitting out 22ppm (pages per minute) of text. You might get near this in draft mode, but real-world speeds are much slower.

In our tests, with 10 full pages of text, we only achieved just over 9ppm, with a 20-second wait for the first page. Meanwhile, a 6x4 photo on glossy paper at the highest quality settings took one minute 30 seconds while an A4 version left us waiting just under four minutes.

When printing on glossy photo paper, quality is excellent for such a cheap printer. Look closely and you'll see fine detail missing and some speckling, but colours are both vivid and realistic.

Canon's Pixma IP2500 might not be the fastest, but at this price it serves well as a budget home printer and is perfectly capable of outputting decent photos.

Read more reviews

Reader Comments

Colors

Colors to sharp for regular paper, not realistic.

Posted by Waidas, 04 Jan 2008

Whatever you do, don't buy this printer

This has got to be the worst buy I've made in 2008! Bought in January, I took the first one back the same day I bought it as it had already been used (security seal by Canon my arse!) We then had to get a seperate USB cable (no biggie) Then we realised that the paper feed isn't fantastic in any way, mean or form. Now, 3 months later, after printing off 3 photos last week it doesn't want to take any paper at all, it seems the paper feed is completely jammed, having looked at it it isn't dirty, dusty or any other thing that could be physically wrong with it. Exceptionally annoying! So advice to anyone - pay an extra £5 and save yourself the £30-odd they originally cost as I'm off to get a new one...

Posted by Michelle, 15 Apr 2008

display:none  

Add your comment

All fields must be completed. Your email address will not be displayed or used to send marketing messages.

All messages will be checked by moderators before appearing on the site.

See our Privacy Policy for more information.

Great benefits for subscribers!

Most popular articles

Poll

Which is your preferred web browser

Jargon Buster

Computing terms explained in plain English

CPU

Central Processing Unit. Another term for a computer processor.

Great shopping deals from Computeractive